Arial pairs great with Georgia, Times New Roman and Verdana. All 14 pairings are shown below in real rendered specimens, with the reason each one works. Every pairing below is checked against 8 published typography sources.
What fonts go with Arial? Before answering, it’s worth admitting that some well-regarded typographers think the question shouldn’t be asked at all.
Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders drew Arial for Monotype in 1982, originally for IBM laser printers, and it became the world’s most-seen typeface almost by accident: Microsoft bundled it with Windows as a metrically compatible, royalty-free substitute for Helvetica, and it has shipped on nearly every computer since. That history shows in the letterforms. Arial is a neutral grotesque with even stroke weights and generic proportions built to match Helvetica’s spacing rather than to express a point of view of its own — competent everywhere, distinctive nowhere.
That lack of a point of view is exactly what critics object to. Matthew Butterick’s Practical Typography calls Arial “a bland, zero-calorie Helvetica substitute” and recommends replacing it outright with Avenir, Franklin Gothic or Gill Sans; Pimp my Type lumps it in with Helvetica as a tired default best swapped for something like Aktiv Grotesk or Public Sans. Both arguments are reasonable, and neither helps someone who has to ship a document in Arial today because a client, a template or an operating system already decided for them. The fourteen pairings below assume that reality and work with it.
1. Georgia
Georgia is Matthew Carter’s 1993 screen-optimized serif — generous slab-like serifs, a large x-height and open apertures drawn to survive early low-resolution monitors. Paired with Arial, it produces a clean, undramatic division of labor: Arial for headings, labels and interface chrome, Georgia for the paragraphs. Because both ship on nearly every Windows and Mac system by default, the pairing renders identically everywhere with zero web-font cost and no licensing to arrange. It is a workhorse combination for reports, internal documentation and any project where reliability matters more than personality. Set Georgia at 16–18px for body text.
2. Times New Roman
Times New Roman was drawn by Victor Lardent under Stanley Morison’s direction for The Times in 1932 — a condensed, high-contrast serif with sharp, formal serifs built for narrow newspaper columns. Set against Arial’s even, low-contrast strokes, the pairing reads as old authority meeting new utility: Times New Roman for formal body text or archival material, Arial for headings and interface labels that need to feel current. It costs nothing since both fonts ship on essentially every device in existence. This is one of the most common real-world Arial pairings, appearing repeatedly across independent design surveys.
3. Verdana
Verdana was also drawn by Matthew Carter, this time in 1996 specifically for on-screen legibility: wider counters, looser spacing and a taller x-height than Arial, built to stay readable at very small sizes on low-resolution displays. Reserving Verdana for body copy or fine print while Arial covers headlines lets each face do the job it was actually engineered for, rather than stretching Arial across every size where it doesn’t excel. Both are free and pre-installed nearly everywhere, so there is no rendering risk. Use Verdana at 12–14px for captions, legal text and dense tabular data.
4. Trebuchet MS
Vincent Connare designed Trebuchet MS for Microsoft in 1996, giving it rounder terminals and slightly humanist curves that read as friendlier and more approachable than Arial’s stricter grotesque forms. Using Trebuchet MS for headings while Arial holds the body text lets a page feel warmer at the top without the personality trickling down into long paragraphs, where Trebuchet’s rounder shapes read less crisply than Arial’s plainer ones. Both ship free on Windows and are widely available elsewhere, so the combination costs nothing. Keep Trebuchet MS above 18px; its charm fades at small interface sizes.
5. Palatino
Hermann Zapf designed Palatino in 1948 for the Stempel foundry — a calligraphic, broad-proportioned serif with moderate contrast and an old-style warmth closer to a humanist hand than a mechanical grid. Set as a title face above Arial’s plain body copy, it brings elegance Arial deliberately doesn’t try to match, so the pairing works as an “expressive heading, neutral body” split rather than a stylistic blend. Palatino ships on macOS and is available on many Windows installs as well, keeping the pairing largely license-free. Reserve Palatino for titles and short display lines only.
6. Open Sans
Open Sans is a humanist sans with open apertures and upright stress, drawn by Steve Matteson for legibility across both print and screen. Set against Arial’s stricter, more mechanical grotesque forms, it reads as the warmer, friendlier option — a step up from Arial’s plainness without leaving sans-serif territory entirely, which makes the swap feel like a mild upgrade rather than a jarring contrast. Free on Google Fonts. Use Open Sans for body copy and Arial for administrative or system-generated text where a webfont can’t be guaranteed to load.
7. Oswald
Oswald is a condensed grotesque with tall, narrow proportions that give headlines a poster-like density Arial’s plain, even width can’t match. Pairing the two lets Oswald claim vertical space efficiently in titles while Arial keeps paragraph text at a normal, comfortable width underneath — a display/text split rather than an attempt to make the two faces look related. Free on Google Fonts, and confirmed in real-world use alongside Arial on multiple live sites. Set Oswald in caps for short headlines; it has no useful application at body-text length.
8. Bebas Neue
Bebas Neue is an all-caps, tightly condensed display face — no lowercase, no ambiguity, built purely for poster-level punch. Kept for headlines over Arial body copy, it adds a loud entry point that Arial, doing the quieter work of paragraphs, deliberately doesn’t try to compete with. Because it has no lowercase at all, the hierarchy decision is effectively made for you: Bebas can only ever be the headline. Free on Google Fonts. Strong for event material, posters and any layout that needs a confident opening line before Arial settles into the details.
9. Helvetica
Arial and Helvetica are metrically near-identical — Arial was built to substitute for it — so pairing them isn’t really about visual contrast at all. It is a production substitution: Helvetica, or Helvetica Neue, carries the polished, brand-facing type in a finished design, and Arial quietly fills in wherever a licensed Helvetica isn’t installed, with the swap nearly invisible to a reader. Helvetica requires licensing that Arial doesn’t, which is exactly the situation this “pairing” exists to solve. Use Arial only as Helvetica’s fallback in a font stack, never as a deliberate stylistic choice beside it.
10. Caslon
William Caslon cut his original types in the 1720s — old-style serifs, moderate contrast, and a slightly irregular, hand-cut quality that carries centuries of printed-page history. Setting Caslon against Arial’s flat twentieth-century utility reads as a deliberate “then versus now” move rather than an accident, which suits editorial or publishing projects that want a clear historical anchor somewhere on the page. Caslon is available through most major type retailers and several free digital revivals. Use it for body text or pull quotes, with Arial reserved for captions, bylines and other short functional text.
11. Garamond
Garamond traces to Claude Garamont’s sixteenth-century French types — narrow proportions, light stroke weight and a calligraphic, pen-drawn origin that sits at the opposite end of the spectrum from Arial’s wide, mechanical uniformity. Several independent studios reach for exactly this contrast, using Garamond for expressive display copy or long-form reading and Arial for captions and fine print underneath. Free digital cuts exist (EB Garamond among them) alongside commercial ones, so budget rarely forces the choice. Keep Garamond above 14px, where its light strokes and small x-height stay legible.
12. Questrial
Questrial is a single-weight geometric sans with rounded, open counters and calmer proportions than a true geometric revival like Futura, giving it enough distinct circular structure to read as a separate display voice next to Arial’s straightforwardly neutral, all-purpose forms. Because it comes in only one weight, it works best as a short headline or logotype-adjacent element rather than a full hierarchy on its own, with Arial filling in everything Questrial can’t: body copy, dense UI text, small print. Free on Google Fonts. A quiet, low-cost way to add a little geometry without committing to full display drama.
13. Lucida Grande
Kris Holmes and Charles Bigelow’s Lucida family dates to 1985, and its Grande cut served as Apple’s own system interface font for roughly a decade before macOS moved on. Its slightly wider, warmer take on a humanist sans sits comfortably next to Arial when a design has to look native on both Mac and Windows, with each face simply taking over on its home platform rather than the two being deliberately combined. It is a legacy choice today rather than a contemporary one. Use it only where cross-platform, era-specific consistency with older Apple interfaces genuinely matters.
14. Futura
Paul Renner built Futura for the Bauer foundry in 1927 from true geometric forms — perfect circles, sharp triangular apexes, a single-story lowercase a — giving it a distinct architectural personality that doesn’t compete with Arial’s plainer, general-purpose grotesque shapes. The two can share a layout as distinctive display face plus invisible workhorse, with Futura claiming short headlines and Arial handling everything at reading length. Futura is a commercial retail release with a real licensing cost, which is why it closes this list rather than opening it. Display sizes only; its geometric strictness turns awkward in paragraphs.
Conclusion
There are no absolute rules for font pairing, just principles to guide you. The key is contrast—in weight, in style (serif vs. sans-serif), or in personality. Arial is versatile enough to play well with many different typefaces.
Trust your eye, experiment freely, and remember that the best pairing is the one that serves your content and audience. Typography should enhance communication, not complicate it.
